Kickers averaged 8.2 FP, so it was a pretty good week for them overall. The system had an okay week. "Starts" scored well, although not as highly as the "Marginal Starts," and the former's W-L record was below the "two-thirds right" goal. "Neutrals" scored pretty well as a group and several had double-digit FP, so if you chose wisely from that category, you did well. "Sits" were bad, which is good:
As a reminder, the table shows the Average FP of the kickers in each category. A “Win” is if the recommendation is right, relative to scoring 7 FP. For example, one kicker who rated as “Start” last week scored over 7 FP, so there was one “win.” One “Start” scored under 7 FP, so that was a “loss”, and two equaled 7 FP, which are “ties.” Remember, a “Sit” kicker who gets less than 7 FP is a “win” for the system (three of those last week) and over 7 FP is a “loss” (none of those); a tie is a 7 FP day (one).
The algorithm's record on the year is pretty good. "Sits" are bad options (if sometimes obviously bad ones) and are very close to the "two-thirds right" goal. "Neutrals" are ave...
#1 in accuracy on Fantasy Pros in 2015-2016 with 1st, 2nd, and 3rd overall finishes in 3 of the last 4 years (out of 140+ experts)
Advanced database and unique statistical tools that are tops in the industry
Credibility and top content with a 23-year track record
FREE roster and scoring system import from your league's site
Mobile-friendly site you can use on your phone
A personal portal to your teams with MyGuru, custom news, projections, etc