Comments on: Expert Mock Draft Today http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/2009/06/12/expert-mock-draft-today/ In it's 3rd year, FantasyGuru.com's John Hansen's Fantasy Football Blog Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:12:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: JBeau http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/2009/06/12/expert-mock-draft-today/comment-page-1/#comment-10356 JBeau Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:18:58 +0000 http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/?p=506#comment-10356 Not an incredibly exciting team. Don't trust Bryant or Grant. Good depth at RB, and I do think Holt sees a ton of targets. Wax Man, I would assume he went with LT because he is in a far better offense, with a better QB and weapons around him. Just my guess though. Not an incredibly exciting team. Don’t trust Bryant or Grant. Good depth at RB, and I do think Holt sees a ton of targets.

Wax Man, I would assume he went with LT because he is in a far better offense, with a better QB and weapons around him. Just my guess though.

]]> By: Wax Man http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/2009/06/12/expert-mock-draft-today/comment-page-1/#comment-10320 Wax Man Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:05:18 +0000 http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/?p=506#comment-10320 John - I know you are high on LT this year, but why would you pass on S. Jackson for LT? To me, they are both in the same tier and I would have to go with youth on that one. St. Louis won't be great, but Jackson will be the focal point of the team and LT will loose TD's this year to Sproles. I'm interested in hearing your reasoning, just in case I am in the same situation later this summer. John – I know you are high on LT this year, but why would you pass on S. Jackson for LT? To me, they are both in the same tier and I would have to go with youth on that one. St. Louis won’t be great, but Jackson will be the focal point of the team and LT will loose TD’s this year to Sproles.

I’m interested in hearing your reasoning, just in case I am in the same situation later this summer.

]]> By: Jimmerz http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/2009/06/12/expert-mock-draft-today/comment-page-1/#comment-10308 Jimmerz Sat, 13 Jun 2009 03:03:47 +0000 http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/?p=506#comment-10308 Curious, was Knowshon available when you took Grant? Curious, was Knowshon available when you took Grant?

]]> By: John Hansen http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/2009/06/12/expert-mock-draft-today/comment-page-1/#comment-10307 John Hansen Sat, 13 Jun 2009 02:40:20 +0000 http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/?p=506#comment-10307 I'm glad it was only a mock. Good depth, but this team is lacking the juice I usually go for. I’m glad it was only a mock. Good depth, but this team is lacking the juice I usually go for.

]]> By: Stretch http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/2009/06/12/expert-mock-draft-today/comment-page-1/#comment-10305 Stretch Sat, 13 Jun 2009 01:21:29 +0000 http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/?p=506#comment-10305 John, I agree. I'm not a big fan of Ryan Grant. He is currently not listed on my cheat sheet. But he could surprise, other than that your squad is solid not great. John,

I agree. I’m not a big fan of Ryan Grant. He is currently not listed on my cheat sheet. But he could surprise, other than that your squad is solid not great.

]]> By: Law Firm http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/2009/06/12/expert-mock-draft-today/comment-page-1/#comment-10304 Law Firm Sat, 13 Jun 2009 01:11:52 +0000 http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/?p=506#comment-10304 Wow! PHI DEF available in the 13th round in an expert draft? Hester is falling to me as a #4 in most mocks, so I agree he's a good value. For a non-PPR team, I think you have a decent squad. Wow! PHI DEF available in the 13th round in an expert draft? Hester is falling to me as a #4 in most mocks, so I agree he’s a good value. For a non-PPR team, I think you have a decent squad.

]]>