<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sneak peek at this year&#8217;s rookie class</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/2009/03/27/sneak-peek-at-this-years-rookie-class/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/2009/03/27/sneak-peek-at-this-years-rookie-class/</link>
	<description>In it&#039;s 3rd year, FantasyGuru.com&#039;s John Hansen&#039;s Fantasy Football Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:53:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: FootballGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/2009/03/27/sneak-peek-at-this-years-rookie-class/comment-page-1/#comment-7608</link>
		<dc:creator>FootballGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/?p=411#comment-7608</guid>
		<description>At Pro Football Weekly, Jennings is not listed in the top ten.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At Pro Football Weekly, Jennings is not listed in the top ten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hansen</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/2009/03/27/sneak-peek-at-this-years-rookie-class/comment-page-1/#comment-7607</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/?p=411#comment-7607</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t seen many other lists, but I think we&#039;ll have Jennings higher than most. Nicks is I believe #7 right now on our list, but these guys are interchangeable, especially when they go to their teams. Should have the whole rookie report up late this afternoon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t seen many other lists, but I think we&#8217;ll have Jennings higher than most. Nicks is I believe #7 right now on our list, but these guys are interchangeable, especially when they go to their teams. Should have the whole rookie report up late this afternoon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve A.</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/2009/03/27/sneak-peek-at-this-years-rookie-class/comment-page-1/#comment-7605</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/?p=411#comment-7605</guid>
		<description>I think Chris Wells and Rashad Jennings are the only two 3-down backs in this draft. The other guys just haven&#039;t shown they can handle the load.

It&#039;s my belief that if Jennings had stayed at Pitt, he would be the #2 RB in this class.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Chris Wells and Rashad Jennings are the only two 3-down backs in this draft. The other guys just haven&#8217;t shown they can handle the load.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s my belief that if Jennings had stayed at Pitt, he would be the #2 RB in this class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris R.</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/2009/03/27/sneak-peek-at-this-years-rookie-class/comment-page-1/#comment-7600</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 05:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/?p=411#comment-7600</guid>
		<description>Also very surprising there was no mention of Hakeem Nicks, who many believe will be the best WR from this class...I like Robiske and all, but he doesn&#039;t have the potential that Nicks does, he really has an understanding of the WR position and he ran every pro route in that UNC offense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also very surprising there was no mention of Hakeem Nicks, who many believe will be the best WR from this class&#8230;I like Robiske and all, but he doesn&#8217;t have the potential that Nicks does, he really has an understanding of the WR position and he ran every pro route in that UNC offense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris R.</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/2009/03/27/sneak-peek-at-this-years-rookie-class/comment-page-1/#comment-7599</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 05:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/?p=411#comment-7599</guid>
		<description>Great list and I agree outside of your assessment of Rashad Jennings, seems your selling him a bit short...He&#039;s built more like Steven Jackson then Derrick Ward, his stock has rose all the way to early 2nd, and he could be a guy like Andre Brown who could be a 20 carry back for a team.


I am very high on Brown and Jennings, two big backs with good speed that will get over shadowed because as many as 6 WR&#039;s could go first round.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great list and I agree outside of your assessment of Rashad Jennings, seems your selling him a bit short&#8230;He&#8217;s built more like Steven Jackson then Derrick Ward, his stock has rose all the way to early 2nd, and he could be a guy like Andre Brown who could be a 20 carry back for a team.</p>
<p>I am very high on Brown and Jennings, two big backs with good speed that will get over shadowed because as many as 6 WR&#8217;s could go first round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hansen</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/2009/03/27/sneak-peek-at-this-years-rookie-class/comment-page-1/#comment-7592</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 01:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/?p=411#comment-7592</guid>
		<description>We haven&#039;t fully scouted him out yet (Cook). We&#039;re not ones to read up on what everyone else says about these players, so we&#039;ll have the skinny on him soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We haven&#8217;t fully scouted him out yet (Cook). We&#8217;re not ones to read up on what everyone else says about these players, so we&#8217;ll have the skinny on him soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/2009/03/27/sneak-peek-at-this-years-rookie-class/comment-page-1/#comment-7574</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 08:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/?p=411#comment-7574</guid>
		<description>No mention of Jared Cook?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No mention of Jared Cook?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hansen</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/2009/03/27/sneak-peek-at-this-years-rookie-class/comment-page-1/#comment-7561</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/?p=411#comment-7561</guid>
		<description>Stafford looks like an elite guy, so that&#039;s good. The problem with the RBs is there are a good number of good ones, but only 1-2 who will likely be true featured backs. Of course, 1-2 others could surprise; you don&#039;t really know until they put the pads on. WR is deep but not a lot of studs, maybe 2. TE is decent. 

It&#039;s not a bad class all in all. Not great, but not bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stafford looks like an elite guy, so that&#8217;s good. The problem with the RBs is there are a good number of good ones, but only 1-2 who will likely be true featured backs. Of course, 1-2 others could surprise; you don&#8217;t really know until they put the pads on. WR is deep but not a lot of studs, maybe 2. TE is decent. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a bad class all in all. Not great, but not bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/2009/03/27/sneak-peek-at-this-years-rookie-class/comment-page-1/#comment-7560</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/?p=411#comment-7560</guid>
		<description>it appears you think this draft is pretty much a bust. Stafford is good but top RB, WR, and TE appear to be only average in your opinion. True?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it appears you think this draft is pretty much a bust. Stafford is good but top RB, WR, and TE appear to be only average in your opinion. True?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/2009/03/27/sneak-peek-at-this-years-rookie-class/comment-page-1/#comment-7547</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 02:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fantasyguru.com/blog/?p=411#comment-7547</guid>
		<description>I love Brown outta UCONN.  He fits that mold of guys who come from unheralded programs and perform early in the NFL.  As always the situation these guys get drafted into has alot to do with who gets opportunities but Brown could be great for fantasy teams in 2009</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Brown outta UCONN.  He fits that mold of guys who come from unheralded programs and perform early in the NFL.  As always the situation these guys get drafted into has alot to do with who gets opportunities but Brown could be great for fantasy teams in 2009</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
